Categories
Uncategorized

How to Interpret PulmoScan Oscillometry Data

PulmoScan uses Forced Oscillation Technique (FOT) to deliver quick, effort-free measurements of airway impedance during relaxed breathing. The device analyzes how oscillating pressure waves (5-30 Hz) travel through the respiratory system, generating resistance (R) and reactance (X) curves. 

This post walks you through interpreting oscillometry’s four key parameters, within-breath analysis, and bronchodilator reversibility using a step-by-step approach adapted from the oscillometry interpretation framework in the ERS technical standards [1], Gupta et al., 2021[2], and Brashier et al., 2015[3].

 

At-a-Glance PulmoScan Interpretation Flow

  1. Check quality metrics (COV, coherence)
  2. Look at R5, total resistance
  3. Look at R5–R20, small airway resistance
  4. Look at X5 & AX, small airway compliance & burden
  5. Determine pattern (obstructive, peripheral, restrictive)
  6. Add within-breath analysis, EFL or IFL detection
  7. Consider reversibility, pre- and post-bronchodilator

Step 1: Quality Check Before Interpretation

  • COV (Coefficient of Variation): <10% for adults, <15% for children (R5 parameter)
  • Repeat at least 3 tests for a valid session.
  • Coherence: >0.85 ensures signal reliability

PulmoScan’s software incorporates reference equations from multiple published studies covering a range of ethnicities, enabling results to be compared against the most relevant population norms for each patient. The software displays Z-scores and percent predicted values for comparing the oscillometry test parameters, but the ERS technical standards [1] recommend using Z-scores from reference equations [4, 5]. PulmoScan software flags values beyond the upper limits of normal or ULN (1.645 Z-score) and grades severity automatically, supporting consistent, evidence-based interpretation. 

Step 2: Start with R5: Total Airway Resistance

  • R5 (resistance at 5 Hz) reflects the total resistance from central and peripheral airways.
  • ↑ R5 suggests overall airway narrowing, as in asthma, COPD, or acute bronchoconstriction.
  • Normal R5 means total airway resistance is within expected limits — but you must still check small airway parameters.

Step 3: Assess Small Airway Resistance: R5-R20

  • R20 (resistance at 20 Hz) primarily reflects large/central airways.
  • R5-R20 isolates peripheral airway resistance.
  • ↑ R5-R20 means small airway narrowing, often the earliest sign of obstructive lung disease.
  • A normal R20 but elevated R5-R20 can point to isolated small airway disease, which spirometry often misses.
Impedance parameters measured by lung oscillometry test – resistance and reactance from 5-30Hz.

 Step 4a: Look at X5: Small Airway Reactance

  • X5 (reactance at 5 Hz) reflects the elastic and inertial properties of peripheral airways.
  • More negative ↑ X5 values mean stiffer, less compliant small airways.
  • Seen in restriction (fibrosis, interstitial lung disease) and in severe small airway obstruction (asthma, COPD).

Step 4b: Review AX: Area under the Reactance curve

  • AX is the integrated area under the reactance curve from 5 Hz to Fres (resonant frequency or zero-crossing).
  • ↑ AX indicates greater small airway dysfunction and can amplify findings from X5.
  • AX is highly sensitive to early changes in the small airways.

Step 5: Identify the Pattern

Obstructive

  • ↑ R5, ↑ R5–R20, ↑ X5, ↑ AX
  • Seen in asthma, COPD, bronchiolitis
Peripheral Airway Obstruction
  • Normal- R20, ↑ R5–R20, ↑ X5, ↑ AX
  • Often early asthma/COPD
Typical pattern of oscillometry parameters observed for peripheral airway obstruction
 

Restrictive 

  • Normal/slightly ↑ R5, normal R5–R20, markedly ↑ X5, ↑ AX
  • Seen in fibrosis, ILD, hyperinflation
Typical pattern of oscillometry parameters observed for restrictive airway obstruction

Obstructive with central airway component

  • ↑ R5, ↑ R20, ↑ X5, ↑ AX
  • Normal R5–R20
  • Seen in asthma

For more disease cases, please refer to the examples provided in Gupta et al., 2021[2].

Step 6: Use Within-Breath Parameters for Deeper Insight

PulmoScan can analyze inspiratory vs. expiratory phases within each tidal breath, revealing patterns invisible to whole-breath averages. These within-breath parameters help detect flow limitation:

Expiratory Flow Limitation (EFL)

  • Defined as markedly higher expiratory resistance/reactance compared to inspiration.
  • EFL is a hallmark of COPD, severe asthma, and other obstructive diseases.
  • Mechanism: During expiration, small airways collapse prematurely, trapping air.
  • Oscillometry signal:
    • R5 (exp) markedly higher than R5 (insp)
    • More negative X5 (exp) than X5 (insp)
    • Often seen with dynamic hyperinflation.

Inspiratory Flow Limitation (IFL)

  • Characterized by higher inspiratory resistance/reactance compared to expiration.
  • Suggestive of restrictive mechanics, including upper airway restriction, interstitial lung disease, and chest wall disorders.
  • Mechanism: Increased stiffness or structural limitation reduces inspiratory compliance.
  • Oscillometry signal:
    • R5 (insp) markedly higher than R5 (exp)
    • X5 more negative during inspiration.

Why It Matters:

  • Whole-breath results may appear borderline or normal, but within-breath analysis can reveal dynamic airway behavior that guides diagnosis and therapy.
  • EFL detection can prompt earlier COPD intervention.
  • IFL patterns can push work-up toward restrictive or neuromuscular causes rather than obstructive disease.

Step 7: Bronchodilator Reversibility with PulmoScan

PulmoScan can test reversibility without repeated forced maneuvers. Per ERS guidance, a significant change is:

  • R5 ↓ by ≥40%
  • X5 ↑ by ≥50%
  • AX ↓ by ≥80%

By combining whole-breath parameters with within-breath flow limitation analysis, PulmoScan helps clinicians move beyond a simple “normal/abnormal” report and toward a nuanced, physiology-driven interpretation that can:

  • Detect early disease
  • Differentiate between obstructive and restrictive mechanics
  • Identify dynamic airway collapse or stiffness patterns
  • Track patient response over time, in the clinic or at home.o

*Disclaimer: The PulmoScan Interpretation Guide is provided for general informational purposes only. To date, there is no official interpretation guide or flow chart issued by the American Thoracic Society (ATS) or the European Respiratory Society (ERS). The framework presented herein is derived from published scientific literature as cited and does not represent an official interpretation guideline or flow chart.

Cognita Labs makes no representation or warranty as to its clinical accuracy, completeness, or applicability to individual patients. The content is subject to change as new research emerges, and while Cognita Labs will make reasonable efforts to update the guide, we cannot guarantee that it will always reflect the latest evidence or consensus.

This guide is not a substitute for professional medical judgment. Physicians and other qualified healthcare providers should base their diagnostic and treatment decisions on the complete clinical picture, including the objective airway obstruction data provided by PulmoScan and, when appropriate, additional tests or assessments.

Use of this guide is at the discretion and sole responsibility of the healthcare professional. Cognita Labs disclaims any and all liability for outcomes resulting from reliance on this information.

References:

  1. King, Gregory G., et al. “Technical standards for respiratory oscillometry.” European Respiratory Journal 55.2 (2020).
  2. Gupta, Neeraj, et al. “Oscillometry–The future of estimating pulmonary functions.” Karnataka Paediatric Journal 35.2 (2021): 79-87.
  3. Brashier, Bill, and Sundeep Salvi. “Measuring lung function using sound waves: role of the forced oscillation technique and impulse oscillometry system.” Breathe 11.1 (2015): 57-65.
  4. Gochicoa-Rangel, Laura, and Mario H. Vargas. “How best to choose an oscillometer and reference equations for your patients with asthma.” Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology 134.2 (2025): 159-164.
  5. Liang, Xiaolin, et al. “Clinical application of oscillometry in respiratory diseases: an impulse oscillometry registry.” ERJ open research 8.4 (2022).